Choosing methods before goals?
Analysis methods are often fixed before the phenomenon and the decision are clear.

Listing methods is not the goal. We select and implement techniques around what can be built and what can be validated.
Analysis methods are often fixed before the phenomenon and the decision are clear.
We combine particle methods, robot simulation and AI surrogates to match the target phenomenon.

We combine particle methods, continuum analysis, rigid-body and robot simulation, AI surrogates and real-data correction according to the phenomenon and validation goal. Methods are means, not ends.
We convert real equipment and objects into simulation from CAD, photos, videos, dimensions and logs. Without CAD, we start from simplified models and refine against measured data.
We validate reachable range, interference and motion conditions for robot arms, jigs, conveyors and dedicated machines — checking motion sequences and cycle times before machine tests.
Simulation results are returned to machine conditions, robot motions and equipment design. Success and failure conditions found in simulation become material for deployment decisions.
We reproduce fluids, snow, sand, powders, viscous materials and deformation in computation.
We select and combine numerical methods according to the target phenomenon — fluids, granular media, continua, fracture and large deformation.
We are conducting research and development on computational methods for multi-material interaction. The detailed formulation is currently confidential.
Approximate models trained on costly simulation results accelerate condition search and repeated validation.
Physics models, constraints and measurements reduce physically invalid AI outputs.
Accuracy depends on conditions and data. We define the applicable range through PoCs and joint validation.
Start from the CAD, photos, videos or logs you already have. We scope the PoC together.